SpyderByte: WinHPC.org EnterpriseLinux.org BigBlueLinux.org
 The #1 Site for News & Information Related to Linux High Performance Technical Computing, Linux High Availability and Linux Parallel Clustering
Home About News Archives Contribute News, Articles, Press Releases Mobile Edition Contact Sponsorship Search Privacy
More Links
  • Printer friendly version
  • Share this story

  • Research and Services
    Cluster Quoter
    Windows HPC News
    Cluster Builder
    Hardware Vendors
    Software Vendors
    Training Vendors
    Golden Eggs
    High Availability

    Submit News/Article/PR
    Latest News
    News Archives
    Search Archives
    Featured Articles
    User Groups
    Higher Education
    Cluster List
    Linux HPC News Update
    Stay current on Linux related HPC news, events and information.
    LinuxHPC Newsletter

    Other Mailing Lists:
    Linux High Availability
    Beowulf Mailing List
    Gelato.org (Linux Itanium)

    Linux HPC Links
    Beowulf Users Group
    Cluster Monkey
    High Performance Computing Clusters
    The Aggregate
    Cluster Benchmarks
    Cluster Computing Info Centre
    Coyote Gultch
    Linux Clustering Info Ctr.
    Robert Brown's Beowulf Page
    Sourceforge Cluster Foundry
    HPC DevChannel
    HPC User Forum
    News Feed
    LinuxHPC.org.org has an RSS/RDF feed if you wish to include it on your website.
    Mobile Edition

    Linux Cluster RFQ Form
    Reach Multiple Vendors With One Linux Cluster RFQ Form. Save time and effort, let LinuxHPC.org do all the leg work for you free of charge. Request A Quote...

    LinuxHPC.org is Looking for Interns - If you have experience with Linux clusters and/or cluster applications and you're interested in helping out with LinuxHPC.org let me know. I can promise the experience will be rewarding and educational, plus it'll make good resume fodder. You'll work with vendors and cluster users from around the world. We're also looking for writers and people to do hardware/software reviews. Contact Ken Farmer.

    Latest News

    Multiprocessor Performance Analysis
    Tuesday December 28 2004 @ 07:34AM EST

    Performance Analysis remains a ambigous term when used in the context of computer systems , irrespective of its organization and architecture.An early measure was MIPS. MIPS had fallen out of use , because it does not account for the fact that different sytems require different number of instructions to implement agiven program. Another metric is CPI. Both MIPS and CPI have severe limitations as measures of performance. With the advent of RISC and hardware/software ILP , a new measure MFLOPS was introduced. This measure led to the concept of Theoretical Peak Performance [TPP] , which is simply the algebraic sum of FP pipes and Clock Rate. TPP , however is not useful in predicting the observed performance unless the workload consist of small programs that operate normally close to the peak and provides only a rough indication of what performance can be obtained on real world scientific applications. A more meaningful metric is sutsained performance.

    Execution Time of real programs on an unloaded system i.e. the latency to comlete a job including disk access , memory access , IO activities and OS overhead could be taken as a reliable and reproducible measure for performance , following Hennessey & Patterson. The term CPU performance is defined as the user CPU time on an unloaded system , while system performance is defeined as the elapsed time on an unloaded system.

    For the overall performance evaluation of uniprocessor/multiprocessor systems benchmark suites were introduced since 1980s.The five levels of in decreasing order of accuracy are real applications , scrripted applications , kernels , toy benchmarks and synthetic benchmarks.One of the attempts to create a standardized uniprocessor benchmark suites is by SPEC. SPEC89,SPEC95,SPECcpu2000 are typical benchmarks introduced subsequently.Unfortunately , it is unclear whether the current SPECcpu suite adequately represent todays high performance applications , let alone other application classes such as mobile computing , according to Skardon et.al. For multiprocessors systems bechmarking is more difficult because of at least four reasons pointed out by Cueller et. al and they are immaturity of parallel applications , immaturity of parallel programming languages , sensitivity of programs to behavioral differences , limitaions of simulations. Nevertheless some illustrious benchmarks developed since 1994 for multiprocess performance analyis includes NPB2.x ,ParkBench, LINPACK, HPL etc. Microbenchmarks offering a way to isolate individual aspects of a processor's performance have registered some progess in recent times. For example , memory performance for data intensive applications has been addressed recently uisng the Data Cube by Frumkin et. al.

    A known disadvantage of all these multiprocessor performance benchmarks is that they do not measure system level aspects of performance. A new methodolugy suggested by David Bailey and the LBNL Group suggests a measure which includes system utilization, effectiveness of job scehduling , handling of large jobs , level of process management for multiprocessor production systems.

    The methodology suggested by Bailey defines System Efficiency Ratio and Effective System Performance , which extends the idea of throughput benchmark with features that mimic day-to-day supercomputer centre operations. The system efficiency ratio is independent of of the computational rate and is also relatively independent of the number of processors used,thus permitting comparison between platforms.

    The measures suggested by Bailey provide quantitative data on system contention effects , scheduling efficiency of the system as well as provide useful insight on how to better manage them.

    The methodology could be adopted by the Linux High Performance Cluster Computing Community for commercial/industrial benefits.

    Selected References. 1.Hennessey,Patterson,2003,Computer Architecture:A Quantitative Approach,2.NAS Parallel benchmark Suite available from http://www.nas.nasa.gov,3.Wong,A et al.1999,Evaluating System Effectuveness in High Performance Compuitng Systems , LBNL Technical Report No.44542;4.Wong,A.,et al.,2000,ESP:A System Utilization Benchmark , Proc.Supercomputing 2000 Conference , IEEE Press;5.Skardon et.al.,2003,Challenges in Computer Architecture Evaluation,IEEE Computerpp.30-36

    < Linux Networx Clusterworx 3.2 Provides New Features for Premier Cluster Management | HP ramps up supercomputing push in M'sia >



    Stay up-to-date on the Progress of Microsoft's Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003

    Golden Eggs
    (HP Visual Diagram and Config Guides)
    HP Integrity Family Portrait, IA64
    rx1620 1600MHz 2P MSA1000 Cluster IA64
    rx2620 1600MHz 2P MSA1000 Cluster IA64
    rx4640 1600MHz 4P MSA1000 Cluster IA64
    DL140 3060MHz 2P IA32
    DL140 G2 3600MHz 2P EM64T
    DL145 2600MHz 2P Opteron
    DL145 G2 2600MHz 2P Opteron Dual Core
    DL360 G4 3400MHz 2P EM64T
    DL360 G4p 3800MHz 2P EM64T
    DL380 G4 3800MHz 2P EM64T
    DL385 2800MHz 2P Opteron Dual Core
    DL560 3000MHz 4P IA32
    DL580 G3 3330MHz 4P EM64T
    DL585 2800MHz 4P Opteron Dual Core
    CP3000 32x DL140G2 & DL360G4p GigE EM64T
    CP4000 32x DL145G2 GigE Opteron, Dual Core
    CP4000 64x DL145 GigE Opteron
    CP4000 102x DL145 GigE Opteron
    CP4000 32x DL145 Myri Opteron
    Rocks Cluster 16-22 DL145 Opteron
    Rocks Cluster 30-46 DL145 Opteron
    Rocks Cluster 64-84 DL145 Opteron
    LC3000 GigaE 24-36 DL145 Opteron
    LC3000 Myri 16-32x DL145 Opteron
    LC3000 GigaE 16-22x DL145 Opteron
    LC2000 GigaE 16-22x DL360G3 Xeon
    MSA500 G2, SCSI
    MSA1510i IP SAN 48TB, SCSI and SATA
    MSA1500 48TB, SCSI and SATA
    Dual Core AMD64 and EM64T systems with MSA1500

    Linux Magazine
    At Newstands Now!Linux Magazine

    Click for King, North Carolina Forecast

    PageRank is Google`s measure of the importance of this page!


    Home About News Archives Contribute News, Articles, Press Releases Mobile Edition Contact Sponsorship Search Privacy
         Copyright © 2001-2006 LinuxHPC.org
    Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds
    All other trademarks are those of their owners.
      SpyderByte.com ;Technical Portals